首页> 外文OA文献 >Formulatif Policy Remedies Independent Decision of Public Prosecutor for Perspective in the Criminal Justice System of Indonesia
【2h】

Formulatif Policy Remedies Independent Decision of Public Prosecutor for Perspective in the Criminal Justice System of Indonesia

机译:制定政策补救公诉人的独立决定,以期在印度尼西亚的刑事司法系统中发挥作用

摘要

This dissertation is a research of acquital (vrijspraak)in some criminal cases that were made by the judge, and related with the law effort of appellate and cassation. Due process of law in criminal justice of Indonesia tends to be notgiving satisfaction for the justice seekers. The many amount of criminal casesthat get acquital (vrijspraak) such as the cases of corruption, narcotic, murder, and others got opinion and contra from broad society. The practitioners andtheoreticians of law and so does the justice seekers often spotlight the judge\u27sverdict which is judged as the engineering of justice, full of mafia andfraudulence. The Procedure of Criminal of Indonesia based on the Criminal Code stills seem to contain disharmony of law norms such as not to give the authority to general prosecutor to submit law effort of appellate and cassation upon the acquital (vrijspraak) as written in the Article 67 and Article 244 of Criminal Code, so it creates the disharmony or injustice in the existing law norms about the acquital (vrijspraak) arrangement, it seems that there is an empty norm, even there is a blur norm in the procedure of criminal with Criminal Code as the basis. This research has purpose to give solution upon disharmony that happen in the acquital (vrijspraak) and its law effort for the general prosecutor. Beside that, it also gives a scientifically input for the theoreticians and practitioners. In studying of this acquital (vrijspraak), it uses some approaches, such as the statute approach, the analytical and conceptual approach, the case approach, the comparative approach, and the philosophical approach. The source of the researched law materials related with the primary, secondary, and tertiary law material. The future perspective of acquital (vrijspraak) arrangement construction related to appellate is: “To criminal case verdict given in the first stage court, the defendant or the general prosecutor is able and or has authority to submit the appellate request to the high court including for free verdict”. And the construction of article for acquital (vrijspraak) for cassation is: “To the criminal case verdict given in the last stage by other court except the Supreme Court, the defendant or general prosecutor is able and or has authority to submit the request for cassation to the Supreme Court including the acquital (vrijspraak)”.
机译:本文是对法官所犯的一些刑事案件中的无罪释放(vrijspraak)的研究,与上诉和撤销原判的法律工作有关。印度尼西亚刑事司法中的正当法律程序往往对寻求正义的人感到满意。腐败,麻醉药品,谋杀案等许多无罪的刑事案件都受到广泛社会的反对。法律的从业者和理论家,以及寻求正义的人经常聚焦于法官的判决书,该判决书被认为是正义的工程,充满了黑手党和欺诈行为。根据《刑法》剧照制定的《印度尼西亚刑事诉讼程序》似乎包含法律规范上的不和谐之处,例如不赋予总检察官权力,以对第67条和《刑法典》第244条,因此它在现行关于无罪释放(vrijspraak)安排的法律规范中造成不和谐或不公正,似乎有一个空的规范,甚至在刑事诉讼程序中存在一个模糊的规范。基础。这项研究的目的是解决无罪释放(vrijspraak)中发生的不和谐及其对总检察官的法律努力。除此之外,它还为理论家和实践者提供了科学依据。在研究这种无罪(vrijspraak)时,它使用了一些方法,例如法规方法,分析和概念方法,案例方法,比较方法和哲学方法。研究的法律资料的来源与主要,次要和三次法律资料有关。与上诉有关的无罪释放(vrijspraak)安排建设的未来前景是:“对于在第一级法院作出的刑事案件判决,被告或总检察官有能力或有权将上诉请求提交高等法院,包括:自由裁定”。判处无罪释放的条款的构成是:“对于除最高法院以外的其他法院在最后阶段作出的刑事案件判决,被告或总检察官有能力或有权提交撤销请求。最高法院,包括无罪释放(vrijspraak)”。

著录项

  • 作者

    Artha, I Gede;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 EN
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号